From ddfd3796a724b8819744876ea0603e68c7e2d340 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Sven M. Hallberg" <pesco@khjk.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 16:48:59 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] why not include the lhs in pretty-printed reduce entries?
---
src/backends/lalr.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/backends/lalr.c b/src/backends/lalr.c
index 66fe42c7..aad47d4d 100644
--- a/src/backends/lalr.c
+++ b/src/backends/lalr.c
@@ -836,15 +836,17 @@ void pprint_lraction(FILE *f, const HCFGrammar *g, const HLRAction *action)
if(action->type == HLR_SHIFT) {
fprintf(f, "s%lu", action->nextstate);
} else {
+ fputs("r(", f);
+ h_pprint_symbol(f, g, action->production.lhs);
+ fputs(" -> ", f);
#ifdef NDEBUG
// if we can't print the production, at least print its length
- fprintf(f, "r[%lu]", action->production.length);
+ fprintf(f, "[%lu]", action->production.length);
#else
- fputs("r(", f);
HCFSequence seq = {action->production.rhs};
h_pprint_sequence(f, g, &seq);
- fputc(')', f);
#endif
+ fputc(')', f);
}
}
--
GitLab